> By Yvonne Ridley
> Sunday, October 22, 2006; Page B01
> LONDON
> I used to look at veiled women as quiet, oppressed creatures --
until I was captured by the Taliban.
> In September 2001, just 15 days after the terrorist attacks on
the United States, I snuck into Afghanistan, clad in a head-to-toe
blue burqa, intending to write a newspaper account of life under the
repressive regime. Instead, I was discovered, arrested and detained
for 10 days. I spat and swore at my captors; they called me a "bad"
woman but let me go after I promised to read the Koran and study
Islam. (Frankly, I'm not sure who was happier when I was freed --
they or I.)
> Back home in London, I kept my word about studying Islam -- and
was amazed by what I discovered. I'd been expecting Koran chapters
on how to beat your wife and oppress your daughters; instead, I
found passages promoting the liberation of women. Two-and-a-half
years after my capture, I converted to Islam, provoking a mixture of
astonishment, disappointment and encouragement among friends and
relatives.
> Now, it is with disgust and dismay that I watch here in Britain
as former foreign secretary Jack Straw describes the Muslim nikab --
a face veil that reveals only the eyes -- as an unwelcome barrier to
integration, with Prime Minister Tony Blair, writer Salman Rushdie
and even Italian Prime Minister Romano Prodi leaping to his defense.
> Having been on both sides of the veil, I can tell you that most
Western male politicians and journalists who lament the oppression
of women in the Islamic world have no idea what they are talking
about. They go on about veils, child brides, female circumcision,
honor killings and forced marriages, and they wrongly blame Islam
for all this -- their arrogance surpassed only by their ignorance.
> These cultural issues and customs have nothing to do with Islam.
A careful reading of the Koran shows that just about everything that
Western feminists fought for in the 1970s was available to Muslim
women 1,400 years ago. Women in Islam are considered equal to men in
spirituality, education and worth, and a woman's gift for childbirth
and child-rearing is regarded as a positive attribute.
> When Islam offers women so much, why are Western men so obsessed
with Muslim women's attire? Even British government ministers Gordon
Brown and John Reid have made disparaging remarks about the nikab --
and they hail from across the Scottish border, where men wear skirts.
> When I converted to Islam and began wearing a headscarf, the
repercussions were enormous. All I did was cover my head and hair --
but I instantly became a second-class citizen. I knew I'd hear from
the odd Islamophobe, but I didn't expect so much open hostility from
strangers. Cabs passed me by at night, their "for hire" lights
glowing. One cabbie, after dropping off a white passenger right in
front of me, glared at me when I rapped on his window, then drove
off. Another said, "Don't leave a bomb in the back seat" and
asked, "Where's bin Laden hiding?"
> Yes, it is a religious obligation for Muslim women to dress
modestly, but the majority of Muslim women I know like wearing the
hijab, which leaves the face uncovered, though a few prefer the
nikab.
It is a personal statement: My dress tells you that I am a
Muslim and that I expect to be treated respectfully, much as a Wall
Street banker would say that a business suit defines him as an
executive to be taken seriously. And, especially among converts to
the faith like me, the attention of men who confront women with
inappropriate, leering behavior is not tolerable.
> I was a Western feminist for many years, but I've discovered
that Muslim feminists are more radical than their secular
counterparts. We hate those ghastly beauty pageants, and tried to
stop laughing in 2003 when judges of the Miss Earth competition
hailed the emergence of a bikini-clad Miss Afghanistan, Vida
Samadzai, as a giant leap for women's liberation. They even gave
Samadzai a special award for "representing the victory of women's
rights."
> Some young Muslim feminists consider the hijab and the nikab
political symbols, too, a way of rejecting Western excesses such as
binge drinking, casual sex and drug use. What is more liberating:
being judged on the length of your skirt and the size of your
surgically enhanced breasts, or being judged on your character and
intelligence? In Islam, superiority is achieved through piety -- not
beauty, wealth, power, position or sex.
>
I didn't know whether to scream or laugh when Italy's Prodi
joined the debate last week by declaring that it is "common sense"
not to wear the nikab because it makes social relations "more
difficult." Nonsense. If this is the case, then why are cellphones,
landlines, e-mail, text messaging and fax machines in daily use? And
no one switches off the radio because they can't see the presenter's
face.
> Under Islam, I am respected. It tells me that I have a right to
an education and that it is my duty to seek out knowledge,
regardless of whether I am single or married. Nowhere in the
framework of Islam are we told that women must wash, clean or cook
for men. As for how Muslim men are allowed to beat their wives --
it's simply not true. Critics of Islam will quote random Koranic
verses or hadith, but usually out of context. If a man does raise a
finger against his wife, he is not allowed to leave a mark on her
body, which is the Koran's way of saying, "Don't beat your wife,
stupid."
> It is not just Muslim men who must reevaluate the place and
treatment of women.
According to a recent National Domestic Violence
Hotline survey, 4 million American women experience a serious
assault by a partner during an average 12-month period. More than
three women are killed by their husbands and boyfriends every day --
that is nearly 5,500 since 9/11.
> Violent men don't come from any particular religious or cultural
category; one in three women around the world has been beaten,
coerced into sex or otherwise abused in her lifetime, according to
the hotline survey. This is a global problem that transcends
religion, wealth, class, race and culture.
> But it is also true that in the West, men still believe that
they are superior to women, despite protests to the contrary. They
still receive better pay for equal work -- whether in the mailroom
or the boardroom -- and women are still treated as sexualized
commodities whose power and influence flow directly from their
appearance.
> And for those who are still trying to claim that Islam oppresses
women, recall this 1992 statement from the Rev. Pat Robertson,
offering his views on empowered women: Feminism is a "socialist,
anti-family political movement that encourages women to leave their
husbands, kill their children, practice witchcraft, destroy
capitalism and become lesbians."
> Now you tell me who is civilized and who is not.
>
hermosh@aol.com> Yvonne Ridley is political editor of Islam Channel TV in London
and coauthor
> of "In the Hands of the Taliban: Her Extraordinary Story"
(Robson Books).
